<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCA General Assembly Worship Services - Closing Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psalmsandhymns.com/2009/07/13/pca-general-assembly-worship-services-closing-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psalmsandhymns.com/2009/07/13/pca-general-assembly-worship-services-closing-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Psalms, Hymns and Christian Worship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:51:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Sharpe</title>
		<link>http://www.psalmsandhymns.com/2009/07/13/pca-general-assembly-worship-services-closing-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Sharpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.psalmsandhymns.com/?p=419#comment-553</guid>
		<description>4 - It doesn&#039;t quite count, but Karl D used to be in the PCA, and appears on the Red Mountain CDs.

6 - I highly agree. Probably the best part was getting to catch up with guys like you that I haven&#039;t seen in far too long.

7 - It could be worse.  Someone could have been calling out something awful like 579.  Seriously, who put that in there and left out &quot;Joyful Joyful We Adore Thee&quot;?

I&#039;d love to hear your thoughts on the NT Wright class as well.  His article on the recent TEC resolution is great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4 &#8211; It doesn&#8217;t quite count, but Karl D used to be in the PCA, and appears on the Red Mountain CDs.</p>
<p>6 &#8211; I highly agree. Probably the best part was getting to catch up with guys like you that I haven&#8217;t seen in far too long.</p>
<p>7 &#8211; It could be worse.  Someone could have been calling out something awful like 579.  Seriously, who put that in there and left out &#8220;Joyful Joyful We Adore Thee&#8221;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to hear your thoughts on the NT Wright class as well.  His article on the recent TEC resolution is great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
